Skip to content

Comparing the clinic effects of myopia progression control by different methods

Comparing the clinic effects of myopia progression control by different methods

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800019893
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-12-07
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-12-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Interventions

Five groups:Wear ordinary single-light frame glasses versus peripheral defocusing design frame glasses versus multi-focus soft glasses versus multi-focus hard glasses versus corneal plastic lens, resp

Sponsors

Eye Hostipal of WenZhou Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: myopia children and adolescents

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Eye diseases or without willing to attending this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
vision acuity;axial length;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactJin Wanqing

Eye Hostipal of Wenzhou Medical University

wcyjqw@163.com+86 13506641696

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026