FindTrial
Sign In

The comparation of laparoscopic resection versus open resection for liver cavernous hemangioma

Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Liver Cavernous Hemangioma

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800018145
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-09-01
Start date
2018-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

hepatic hemangioma

Interventions

Group 1:Open resection
Group 2:Laparoscopic resection

Sponsors

West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. patients with hepatic hemangioma; 2. imaging evaluation found that single or multiple tumors, clear clinical symptoms or rapid increase in tumor diameter in asymptomatic patients (average annual increase of >=2 cm); 3. aged 18 to 65 years; 4. preoperative Child-Pugh score <=7 points; 5. eligible to be treated by both laparoscopic resection and open resection; 6. normal cardio-pulmonary function.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. history of upper abdomen surgeries; 2. previous treatment of hepatic hemangioma; 3. abscence of informed consent file; 4. patient with infectious disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
postoperative hospital stay;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
complication rate;reopertion rate;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZhang Ming

West China Hospital, Sichuan University

48284728@qq.com+86 18980606723

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026