FindTrial
Sign In

Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Versus Pneumatic Dilation in Patients with Achalasia: A Prospective Single Center Study

Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Versus Pneumatic Dilation in Patients with Achalasia: A Prospective Single Center Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800016897
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-07-01
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Achalasia

Interventions

PD group:Patients with achalasia underwent PD
POEM group:Patients with achalasia underwent POEM

Sponsors

Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients presenting to the outpatient department and referred for esophageal manometry and endoscopy and diagnosed as idiopathic achalasia were included

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) previous treatment for achalasia; (2) patients with esophageal lesions such as webs, rings, strictures or malignancy of esophagus or stomach; (3) previous history of esophageal or gastric surgeries; (4) age more than 65 years or less than 18 years old.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Eckardt score;LESP;4s IRP;reflux condition;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactWei Zhao

Tianjin Medical University General Hospital

zhaoweihotstone@yeah.net+86 15022327482

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026