FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of transrectal high echo fat pad infiltration anesthesia and local lidocaine gel anesthesia for ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy

Comparison of transrectal high echo fat pad infiltration anesthesia and local lidocaine gel anesthesia for ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800016424
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-06-01
Start date
2018-06-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

prostate cancer

Interventions

2:way of anaesthesia
2:local lidocaine gel anesthesia

Sponsors

Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Participants: clinical imaging examination (such as CT and MR) revealed suspicious prostate nodules not yet diagnosed with prostate cancer; (2) Aged 18-80 years; (3) Inpatient.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Severe coagulation dysfunction; (2) Anorectal pain; (3) Severe immunosuppressive disease; (4) Acute prostatitis; (5) Poor mental status.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
PSA;Post-void residual volume;VAS score;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactYouqiang Fang

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Fang_1573@126.com+86 18988966999

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026