FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of different anesthesia model for Cesarean Delivery in pernicious placenta previa

the effects of spinal combined general anesthesia and spinal combined epidural anesthesia on blood loss of Cesarean Delivery in pernicious placenta previa

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800016408
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-05-31
Start date
2015-10-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pernicious placenta previa

Interventions

1:spinal combined general anesthesia
2:spinal combined epidural anesthesia

Sponsors

Third Military Medical University, the First Affiliated Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
26 Years to 43 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All women diagnosed as pernicious placenta previa(PPP) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and unltrasound received non-emergent caesarean section

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria were consent refusal, contraindication to spinal and epidural anesthesia (coagulation disorder, hyperthermia>38, BMI>35kg/m2, Anaesthetic allergy, e.t.c), with other pregnancy complications, age>45, emergent deliveries, neuraxial failure, enrolled into other's clinical studies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
blood loss;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLu Kaizhi

Third Military Medical University, the First Affiliated Hospital

lukaizhi@163.net+86 13608380096

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026