Skip to content

Ultrasound Assisted Closed Reduction And Internal Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Of Lateral humeral condyle fractures

Ultrasound Assisted Closed Reduction And Internal Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Of Lateral humeral condyle fractures

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800016235
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-05-21
Start date
2018-05-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

lateral humeral condyle fractures

Interventions

Assisted Closed Reduction And Internal Fixation:Assisted Closed Reduction And Internal Fixation
Open Reduction and Internal Fixation :Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Sponsors

Wuhan Children's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
No minimum to 12 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All participants had been diagnosed with lateral condyle fractures; Patient ages less than 12 years old.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: participants had not been diagnosed with lateral condyle fractures; Patient ages over 12 years old. an open wound at the elbow, or unstable vital signs or associated life-threatening injuries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Range of motion (ROM);Lateral spur formation;Length of surgery (min);

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactSHEN XIANTAO
XTshenWH@aliyun.com+86 15972031968

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026