FindTrial
Sign In

comparison of hybrid total arch repair and conventional total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for type-A acute aortic dissection: a randomized pilot study

comparison of hybrid total arch repair and conventional total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for type-A acute aortic dissection: a randomized pilot study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800016063
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-05-09
Start date
2018-05-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stanford type-A acute aortic dissection

Interventions

hybrid total arch repair group:hybrid total arch repair
conventional total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk:conventional total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk

Sponsors

Fuwai Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
50 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Standford type A acute aortic dissection or type A aortic hematoma; 2. Aged between 50-59 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Genetictraumaticand infective aortic disease; 2. Previous TEVAR intervention or open heart surgery; 3. LVEF 3mg/ dL or 270 umol/L); 11. Recent history of psychiatric disease that may impair compliance with protocol; 12. Patient (or legal guardian)unable of unwilling to provide written, informed consent before study enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
composite endpoint of mortality, neurological deficit, renal dysfunction;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactYu Cuntao

Fuwai Hospital

cuntaoyu@126.com+86 13501075752

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026