FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Real-time ultrasound-guided epidural access using a paramedian transverse vs paramedian sagittal scan at the level of lumbar articular process

Comparison of Real-time ultrasound-guided epidural access using a paramedian transverse vs paramedian sagittal scan at the level of lumbar articular process

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800015815
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-04-23
Start date
2018-05-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

paramedian transverse scan:paramedian transverse scan
paramedian sagittal scan:paramedian sagittal scan

Sponsors

Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I–III patients scheduled for lower extremity surgery, in whom a CSE anesthesia was planned, were enrolled for this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients will be excluded if they had a body mass index (BMI) > 28, clinically obvious or known spinal deformity, infection in the back, allergy to local anesthetic drugs, previous spine surgery, or coagulopathy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
success rate of puncture;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
imaging quality score;puncture operation time;adverse effects rate;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactYun Wang

Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University

wangyun129@ccmu.edu.cn+86 13521611825

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026