FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Flexible in paediatric patients weighing 5-10kg: a prospective randomized clinical study

Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Flexible in paediatric patients weighing 5-10kg: a prospective randomized clinical study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800015695
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-04-15
Start date
2018-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

airway management fro pediatrics

Interventions

Flexible LMA Group:Flexible LMA Group
Supreme LMA Group:Supreme LMA Group

Sponsors

Shanghai Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, Fudan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
No minimum to 2 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 60 paediatic patients weighing 5-10kg, 5M-2 years of age, ASA physical status 1-2 and who were scheduled for an ophthalmolog-y sugery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients were excluded if they had anactive respiratory illness (cough, fever thinorrhoea) on the day of anaesth-esia, or a potentially difficult airway.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
oropharyngeal leak pressure;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
fibreoptic view;successful insertion time;successful rate;oxygen desaturation;gastric insufflation;airway reflex;bloodstaining on the device;postoperative complication;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXia Shen

Shanghai Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, Fudan University

shenxia@eentanesthesia.com+86 13611874118

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026