FindTrial
Sign In

A Comparative Study of Two Methods for Ambu Laryngeal Mask Insertion

A Comparative Study of Two Methods for Ambu Laryngeal Mask Insertion

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800015096
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-03-07
Start date
2017-03-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

A Comparative Study of Two Methods for Ambu Laryngeal Mask Insertion

Interventions

Ambu Laryngeal Mask Deflated versus Non-deflated:Ambu Laryngeal Mask Deflated

Sponsors

Plastic Surgery Hospital, CAMS, PUMC
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: No other genetic diseases; Complete clinical information; Obtained informed consent of patients or guardians.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Suffering from other physical illnesses; no complete clinical information; no informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The difficulty of placement;insertion time of Laryngeal mask;Ventilation;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
grading of FOB microscope;Hemodynamic changes;Duration of anesthesia;placement time of Laryngeal mask;Duration of operation;insertion injury of Laryngeal mask(24 hours after surgery);—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactDong Yang

Department of Anesthesiology, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

yangdonglin28@126.com+86 13661267522

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026