A pilot trial comparing the first-pass intubation success of the Airtraqlaryngoscope versus the Macintosh direct laryngoscope in patients requiringgeneral anaesthesia for elective operation.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR1800015046

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2018-02-28

Start date

2018-03-06

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation condition

Interventions

Two groups:intubation using Airtraq laryngoscope versus using Machitosh laryngoscope

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult >=18 years old; 2. Receiving general Anaesthesia requiring intubation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Known or predicted difficult bad-mask ventilation; 2. Patient scheduled for awake or asleep fibreoptic intibation; 3. Pa tient requiring rapid sequence intubation; 4. Language or cognitive barrier that precludes patient from an adequate informed consent; 5. Patients or snesthetists refusal.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Study feadilibility;	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
local incidence of first-pass success rate;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactDr Carmen Lam

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Tuen Mun Hospital

carmenlam1013@gmail.com+852 90804633

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026