FindTrial
Sign In

The comparison study of extremly minimal incision vs. traditional Gbison incision kidney transplantation

The comparison study of extremely minimal incision vs. traditional Gbison incision kidney transplantation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800014734
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-01-31
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uremic syndrome

Interventions

Group 1:Traditional Gibson incision
Group 2:Extremely minimal incision

Sponsors

Urology Department/ Organ Transplantation Center, WestChina Hospital, Sichuan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Aged >18 years, BMI=25kg/m2, can fully understan the study protocol and informed consent, fully match with the criteria for kidney transplantation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: exclusion criteria refer to kidney transplantation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
incision length;Postoperative pain score;scar score;perioperative complications;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
patients survival;graft survival;graft function;delayed graft function;—

Contacts

Public ContactLin Tao

Urology Department/ Organ Transplantation Center, WestChina Hospital, Sichuan University

kidney5@163.com+86 18980602093

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026