Skip to content

Comparison of the application of different exhaled breath condensate collection devices in patients with mechanical ventilation during anaesthesia

Comparison of the application of different exhaled breath condensate collection devices in patients with mechanical ventilation during anaesthesia

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR1800014300
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2018-01-04
Start date
2018-01-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparotomy

Interventions

Simple Group:Use Water Gathering Cup
Self-made Group:Use Self-made Modified Device
Modified Ecoscreen Group:Use Modified EcoscreenCondenser
Non Collection Group:Nothing

Sponsors

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class I or II, patients scheduled for laparotomy under general anesthesia, were enrolled in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria were a history of respiratory diseases and a recent history of upper respiratory tract infection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Amount of Collected Exhaled Breath Condensate;Airway Related Adverse Reactions;Concentration of TNF-a;Concentration of 8-isoPG F2a;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Vital Signs;Tidal Volume;Peak Airway Pressure;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLei Yao

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University

yaoleijiangsu1987@163.com+86 18862920110

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026