FindTrial
Sign In

A randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme and LMA Flexible for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in pediatric ophthalmology patients

A randomised comparison of the LMA Supreme and LMA Flexible for controlled ventilation during genera

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-TRC-14005226
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2014-09-09
Start date
2014-09-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

airway management fro pediatrics

Interventions

Flexible standard Group:Standard Flexible LMA
Flexible larger Group: larger type of LMA
Supreme standard LMA:Supreme type of LMA
Supreme larger Group: Larger supreme type of LMA

Sponsors

Shanghai Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Hospital, Fudan University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Age
No minimum to 6 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children weighing 10-20kg, 5M-6 years of age, ASA physical status 1-2 and who were scheduled for an ophthalmolog-y sugery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients were excluded if they had anactive respiratory illness (cough, fever thinorrhoea) on the day of anaesth-esia, or a potentially difficult airway.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
airway leak pressur;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
fibreoptic view;the time for successful insertion;successful rate;oxygen desaturation;gastric insufflation;airway reflex action;bloodstaining on the device;postoperative complication;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXia Shen
shenxia@eentanesthesia.com+86 13611874118

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026