Skip to content

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrasound-guided Seldinger method of placing peripherally inserted central catheters(PICC): A randomized controlled trial

Cost-effectiveness analysis and clinical effect of ultrasound-guided Seldinger method of placing peripherally inserted central catheters

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-TRC-14004993
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2014-07-15
Start date
2009-05-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cancer etc

Interventions

experimental group:ultrasound-guided Seldinger puncture PICC
control:Traditional method of puncture

Sponsors

Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Hunan, China
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) 20–60 years of age; (2) The expected treatment duration will be longer than 6 months; (3) ability to be ambulatory; and (4) ability to give consent and express wishes.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) prior chemotherapy; (2) in situ tube replacement; (3) catheterization location in location besides the arm (i.e. via external jugular vein or femoral vein, etc.); (4) known or suspected systemic infection, puncture site infection, injury, or history of radiation; (5) superior vena cava syndrome; (6) PICC insertion ipsilateral to breast cancer surgery; and (7) history of radiotherapy near the vena cava.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
medical cost;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
successful single-attempt puncture;complication incidence;patient comfort level;Bleeding in 24 hours;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactJianghong Tan
519539794@qq.com+86 13973303695

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026