FindTrial
Sign In

A prospective randomized trial to compare the effect of endoscopic tunnel technique and surgical enucleation for esophageal neoplasm from muscularis propria

A prospective randomized trial to compare the effect of endoscopic tunnel technique and surgical enucleation for esophageal neoplasm from muscularis propria

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-TRC-14004759
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2014-04-30
Start date
2014-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Neoplasm from Muscularis Propria

Interventions

Endoscopic Tunnel Technique:Endoscopic Tunnel Technique
surgical enucleation:surgical enucleation

Sponsors

the Chinese PLA General Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
16 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosed as esophageal neoplasm from muscularis propria without blood supply. The transverse diameter ranged from 1 to 3.5 cm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Endoscopic resection cannot be performed because of severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction, coagulopathy. Tunneling site with a large area of scar or anastomosis. Ulceration on the surface of the tumor or no room for the tunnel.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
En bloc resection rate;Complete resection rate;Complication rate;operation time;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
cost of operation;—

Contacts

Public ContactLinghu Enqiang

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital

linghuenqiang@vip.sina.com.cn+86 10 66936998

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026