FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of LMA ProSeal with LMA Supreme for the airway management in patients with general anesthesia: new insertion technique versus new laryngeal mask airway

Comparison of LMA ProSeal with LMA Supreme for the airway management in patients with general anesthesia: new insertion technique versus new laryngeal mask airway

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-TRC-14004588
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2014-04-29
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

use of Laryngeal Mask Airway

Interventions

LMA Proseal group:LMA Proseal was inserted with traditional digital
improved LMA Proseal group:LMA Proseal was inserted with new tube core shaping technique

Sponsors

First Hospital of Ningbo City
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 86 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy with no significant comorbidity, and did not have an anticipated difficult airway; ASA I-III; aged 18 years and more.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: BMI>35kg/m2, have sore throa before operation,have serious gastroesophageal reflux disease, have an anticipated difficult airway (mouth opening<2.5cm,Mallampati grade IV.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the success rate of insertion at the first attempt;the time taken for insertion;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactWu Jin

Department of Anesthesia, First Hospital of Ningbo City

doctorwj@126.com+86 13738824672

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026