Skip to content

Randomized controlled trial of Propess versus amniotomy and oxytocin for induction of labour

Dinoprostone vaginal extended release system (Propess) for induction of labour versus amniotomy plus syntocinon, a randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-TRC-14004079
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2014-01-03
Start date
2014-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Induction of labour

Interventions

Sponsors

The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Nulliparous pregnant women admitted to antenatal ward for induction of labour at or more than 37 weeks with favourable cervix according to modified Bishop score (>=6)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Rupture of membranes, women aleready in labour before recruitment, presence of indication for caesarean section, major fetal anomaly, women with unfavourable cervix.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Failed induction rat;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfaction score, Total admission time (;

Contacts

Public ContactChor Chung Ming
cmchor@cuhk.edu.hk+852 2632 3190

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026