Skip to content

The Comparison of Percutaneous Microwave Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation of liver tumors

The Comparison of Percutaneous Microwave Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation of liver tumors

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-TRC-12003101
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2012-12-06
Start date
2011-07-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

liver tumor

Interventions

B:microwave ablation

Sponsors

Department of Medical Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) liver tumor diagnosed by clinical criteria or biopsy; (2) age range of 20-75 years old; (3) Single lesion <=8cm in dimension or multiple lesions <=5 in number; (4) liver function Child-Pugh A or B; (5) ineligible for surgical resection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) liver apparently astrophy, ablation zone supposed to be more than 1/3 of the liver volume; (2) suffered from esophageal(gastric) variceal bleeding recently; (3) infiltrating liver carcinoma with thrombosis in main or the first branch of portal vein or in liver veins; (4) major organ failure; (5) infection esp. in biliary tract; (6) disorder of blood coagulation function or server abnormal in blood system; (7) refractory ascites; disorder of consciousness or dyscrasia; (8) distance away from main bile duct, gallbladder, gastrointestinal tract less than 5mm.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
ablation efficiency rate;occuring rate of complication;occuring rate of side effect;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXie Xiaoyan
xxy1992@21cn.com+86 13719210801

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026