FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of the CEL-100 videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen endobronchial tube intubation: a randomised controlled trial

Comparison of the CEL-100 videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope for double-lumen endobronchial tube intubation: a randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-TRC-11001836
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2011-12-14
Start date
2011-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

a double-lumen endobronchial tube intubation

Interventions

1:the CEL-100 videolaryngoscope
2:Macintosh laryngoscope

Sponsors

Department of Anesthesiology, Cancer centre, Sun Yat-Sen University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) elective open thoracic surgery patients requiring a double lumen endobronchial tube intubation to provide one-lung ventilation for their procedures; (2) ASA physical status: 1~3; (3) a signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) elective open thoracic surgery patients requiring a double lumen endobronchial tube intubation to provide one-lung ventilation for their procedures; (2) ASA physical status: 1~3; (3) a signed informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
intubation time;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comamark-Lehane grade;succseeful intubation on 1st attempt;intubation attempts;manoeuvres;ease of intubation;complications;—

Contacts

Public ContactWenqian Lin
wenqianlin@21cn.com+86 13825149286

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026