Skip to content

the contrast of the outcome between replacing ascending aorta + reconstructing aortic arch with triple-branched stent graft and replacing ascending aorta +replacing half aortic arch to treat the aortic dissection

the contrast of the outcome of the two different operational methods to treat the aortic dissection

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-TRC-11001828
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2011-12-18
Start date
2009-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

aortic dissection

Interventions

test group:place triple-branched stent graft into aortic arch to reconstruct

Sponsors

The Affiliated Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
30 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: aortic dissection; type A; onset time < 2 weekss

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: type B aortic dissection; onset time > 2 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
operation time;length of stay;aortic angiorgraphy CT;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactChen Liang-Wan
chenliangwan@tom.com+86 13358255333

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026