Comparative Study Of Laparoscopic Versus Open repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

ChiCTR

Registry ID

ChiCTR-TRC-11001607

Enrollment

Unknown

Registered

2011-01-28

Start date

2010-04-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

acute perforated peptic ulcer disease

Interventions

Laparoscopic:Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease

Open:Open repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: from October 2010 to October 2012, the adult female or male patients over 18-year-old clinically diagnosed acute perforated peptic ulcer disease with the indication of surgical repair are supposed to be recruited.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) with severe underlying diseases, the surgery intolerable or contraindicated; 2) the preoperational diagnosis is perforated gastral carcinoma; 3) with several upper abdominal surgical history; 4) laparoscopic repair refused; 5) Pregnancy; 6) other lesions found in the surgery or other surgery done.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
age, Gender, height, weight, body temperature, body mass index (BMI), white blood cell count, C reaction protein;	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
the body temperature in The first day after the operation, WBC count and CRP level, length of hospital stay;	—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactGe Bujun

hqhq007@hotmail.com+86 021-66111134

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026