Skip to content

Microwave Ablation versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Local Treatment Efficacy of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Experimental and Clinical Studies

Microwave Ablation versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Local Treatment Efficacy of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Experimental and Clinical Studies

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-TNRC-10001066
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2010-10-22
Start date
2009-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Interventions

Group RF:PRFA
Group MW:PMCT

Sponsors

The Eastern Hepatobiliraly Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male and female aged 20 to 80 years old; 2. Clinical diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma; 3. single nodule; 4. less than 3 cm in diameter; 5. liver function classed as Child-Pugh class A; 6. no evidence of extrahepatic metastases and vascular invasion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Can not be regular follow-up; 2. Severe heart, lung, kidney and other organ diseases.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Coagulation zone;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
complete ablation rate;local tumor progression rate;distant recurrence rate;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactGuojun Qian
qgjs@sina.com+86 021 81875161

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026