Skip to content

Clinical study of safety and effectiveness of 60 degree endoscopic resection stapler in low rectal cancer patients

Clinical study of safety and effectiveness of 60 degree endoscopic resection stapler in low rectal cancer patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-ROC-17011808
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-06-29
Start date
2017-06-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

low rectal cancer

Interventions

Universal mirror cutting stapler and cartridge case set:NA
Endoscopic cutting stapler and disposable nail case group:NA

Sponsors

Beijing Friendship Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) over 18 years of age, male or female; 2) preoperative pathological evidence supports the diagnosis of rectal cancer; 3) conforms to the standard of diagnosis of rectal cancer: low end of the tumor from the anal margin less than 8cm (sagittal pelvic magnetic distance evaluation); 4) preoperative imaging was assessed for stage II (T3-4, lymph node negative, tumor penetrating the muscularis of the intestinal wall) or stage III rectal cancer (lymph node positive, without distant metastasis); 5) no surgical contraindication and complete resection of the tumor is expected; 6) the Karnofsky score is more than 70; 7) patients who can understand the purpose of the trial and voluntarily sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) history of abdominal surgery; 2) use hormone or immunosuppressant treatment; 3) past or combined with other malignancies; 4) with a history of severe lung or heart disease, unable to tolerate radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or surgery; 5) have serious allergies or allergies; 6) the subjects were reluctant to comply with the study protocol or follow-up plan; 7) any incomplete surgical procedure is expected during the procedure; 8) poor cognitive ability or mental abnormality; 9) other reasons that the researchers believe should be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Use the nail box number is not smaller than 3 a rate;Average cut closure length;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactZhongtao Zhang

Beijing Friendship Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University

yangyingchi2004@sina.com+86 15810152032

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026