Skip to content

Comparison of the teaching effects of the order of using vedio or direct laryngoscope

Comparison of the teaching effects of the order of using vedio or direct laryngoscope

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-OOR-16008364
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-04-26
Start date
2016-04-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

tracheal intubation used by visual and direct intubation after induction of anesthesia

Interventions

Group A (direct laryngoscope priority group)
Group B (video laryngoscope priority group):adjust the use order of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscope

Sponsors

Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA I/II patients between 20-70 years old; No limitations forgender, except pregnant women; patients without difficult airway.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Above ASA II patients; Preoperative assessment of patients'airways indicated that their airways were difficult for tracheal intubation; patients of incomplete data records for various reasons.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
intubation time;learning curve;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLianhua Chen

Shanghai General Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

chenlianhua1991@aliyun.com+86 13301978757

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026