FindTrial
Sign In

Subjective and objective benefit of bone conductive implants in single-sided deafness after acoustic neuroma surgery

Subjective and objective benefit of bone conductive implants in single-sided deafness after acoustic neuroma surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-OOC-17012339
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
1990-01-01
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acoustic neuroma

Interventions

Case series:underwent BoneBridge implantation after translabyrinthine acoustic neuroma resection

Sponsors

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University, School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients aged 18 and above; 2. Unilateral acoustic neuroma; 3. Hearing level at Class C-D acoording to AAO-HNS Classification; 4. Contralateral hearing level at Class A acoording to AAO-HNS Classification; 5. Skull width could contain bone-conducted implants; 6. Patients had approriate expectations about post-operative effects and could finish follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Poor general condition; 2. NF2; 3. Patients were diagnosed as other diseases.

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Localization Test;Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, APHAB;Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness Questionnaire, BBSS;Hearing In Noise Test;—

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Signal Noise Ratio;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactWU Hao

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University, School of Medicine

wuhao@sh9hospital.org+86 18801970686

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026