FindTrial
Sign In

Fleksible ureterorenoskopi ve Mikroperkutan Nefrolitotomi tekniklerinin Cost-effektivite acisindan karsilastirlmasi

Comparison of Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus MicroPerc in terms of cost-effectivity: Which is superior?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-OOC-14005598
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2014-12-02
Start date
2014-12-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal stone

Interventions

Two groups:Flexible uretrorenoscopy or MicroPerc

Sponsors

None
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
10 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with kidney stones who will undergo flexible ureterorenoscopy or micro Perc procedures; Patients not having complicated urinary tract infection; Patients without congenital anomally of the urinary system; Patients without bleeding disorders; Patients who can tolerate general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with active urinary tract infection; Patients with bleeding disorders; Patients with congenital anomally of the urinary tract; Patients with serious metabolic or hearth disorders who can not tolerate general anesthesia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cost-effectivity (in dollars);—

Countries

Turkey

Contacts

Public ContactMurat Bagcioglu, MD
dr.muratbagcioglu@hotmail.com+905062020066

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026