FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of CE-Chirp versus click and tone pip stimulation for cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

Comparison of CE-Chirp versus click and tone pip stimulation for cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-OO-12002775
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2012-10-23
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

cVEMP

Interventions

click:100us click 94.5dB nHL
Blackman Pip2-1-2 cycles:500Hz 100 dB nHL Blackman Pip2-1-2 cycles
CE-Chirp Octave Band:500Hz 100 dB nHL CE-Chirp Octave Band

Sponsors

Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 30 volunteers (aged range 20–40years) without the history of hearing loss, vertigo or balance problems were evaluated by Blackman Pip2-1-2 cycles-induced VEMPs from April 2011 to September 2012 and all subjects were evaluated with otoscopic examination, pure tone audiometry, tympanometry, and stapedial reflexes on the first visit to rule out any possible otologic disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects were detected with vestibular disease,hearing loss or had abnormal responses in the cVEMP test by Blackman Pip2-1-2 cycles

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
P1;N1;AM;P1-N1;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactBochen Wang
470324650@qq.com+86 13763358663

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026