Skip to content

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of pelvic reconstruction with transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair: hysterectomy or not?

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of pelvic reconstruction with transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair: hysterectomy or not?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-ONRC-12002840
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2012-12-10
Start date
2012-06-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

pelvic organ prolapse

Interventions

hysterectomy:transvaginal pelvic reconstruction+hysterectomy
uterine preservation:transvaginal pelvic reconstruction

Sponsors

Fuzhou General Hospital Nanjing Military Region
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
18 Years to 99 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients who underwent surgery with the synthetic mesh

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Unable to give informed consent to participate

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20);The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7);Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual;

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score;Anatomical no provement according to POP-Q score;Presence/absence of complication;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactSong Yanfeng
zlele@126.com+86 13905909403

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026