Skip to content

A comparison of protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation in ICU patients

A comparison of protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation in ICU patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-ONRC-12001900
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2012-01-17
Start date
2010-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

acute respiratory failure

Interventions

Protocol-directed wean:Weaning from mechanical ventilation is protocol-directed

Sponsors

Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients were included who were intubated and ventilated for more than 24 hours in the intensive care unit.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. age less than 18 years; 2. transferred into the unit having been ventilated in another hospital; 3. dependence on mechanical ventilation for at least two weeks before enrollment; 4. GCS<7; 5. already enrolled in another research study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the overall duration of mechanical ventilation;the length of stay in the intensive care unite;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
the rate of re-intubation within 48 hours of extub;the rate of removal of the breathing tube by the patient;the rate of tracheostomy;the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia;the ICU mortality;the hospital mortality;the rate of mechanical ventilation for more than 21 days;the length of overall hospitalization;the cost of respiratory care, intensive care, and overall hospitalization;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactXiuming Xi
XXM2937@sina.com+86 010 88062937

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026