Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficacy of Laser Intervention for Onychomycosis in different durations of Treatment

Comparison of the Efficacy of Laser Intervention for Onychomycosis in different durations of Treatment

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-ONC-17012746
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-09-20
Start date
2012-06-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

onychomycosis

Interventions

3:laser treatment

Sponsors

Department of Dermatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The study was approved by the ethics committee. Patients aged 18-60 years with typical onychomycosis-related symptoms, who were positive by direct microscopy examination, were enrolled in the study. All patients provided written informed consent, and were available for timely follow-up visits. Topical antifungal agents were prohibited for one month, and systemic antifungal agents for six months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The exclusion criteria included patients who (1) automatically withdrew or changed the treatment regimen or follow-up plan; (2) received other antifungal therapy or agents affecting the outcome during the study; (3) showed continuous or semi-continuous nail discoloration, for example, abnormal nail pigmentation caused by the use of topical antifungal therapy such as Castellani solution, nail coloring dyes or polishes containing magnesium and iron, or occupational exposure to colorants or bitumen, regardless of the therapeutic or cosmetic purpose; (4) used photosensitivity-inducing medications within six months; (5) were pregnant; (6) had subungual hematoma or nevoid formation, and (7) had other concomitant onychopathy-induced diseases such as nail-plate psoriasis, lichen planus, and atopic dermatitis. Those who withdrew from the study due to side effects were analyzed for side effects but not for efficacy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
clinical efficacy;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactJunying Zhao

Beiijng Friendship Hospital

zjy63014411@aliyun.com+86 13621098570

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026