FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of volume management after early fluid resuscitation using critical ultrasound and pulse indicator continuous cardiac output in elderly patients with septic shock

Comparison of volume management after early fluid resuscitation using critical ultrasound and pulse indicator continuous cardiac output in elderly patients with septic shock

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-ODC-16010292
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-12-28
Start date
2016-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock

Interventions

Ultrasound Group:Using ultrasound to guide the fluid management
PiCCO Group:Using PiCCO to guide the fluid management
Ultrasound combined with PiCCO Group:Ultrasound and PiCCO

Sponsors

Zhejiang Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
60 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Aged=60 years; (2) Fulfilled the criteria for septic shock (as defined by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012); (3) The goals of 6 hours fluid resuscitation has been achieved (CVP 8-12mmHg, MAP>65mmHg, urine output=0.5ml/kg, ScvO2 >70%); (4) Tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Advanced cancer, severe malnutrition, acute liver failure, low tidal volume ventilation,pregnant women,ultrasound image is not possible to obtain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
28-day mortality;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Length of ICU stay;Length of hospital stay;Duration of mechanical ventilation;Duration of CRRT support;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactShijin Gong

Zhejiang Hospital

gsj801@126.com+86 13357102172

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026