Skip to content

Comparison between the clinical effect of propofol plus etomidate (EP) alone and fentanyl or sufentanil in balanced EP sedation for colonoscopy

Comparison between the clinical effect of propofol plus etomidate (EP) alone and fentanyl or sufentanil in balanced EP sedation for colonoscopy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-IPR-17010907
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-03-18
Start date
2017-03-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intravenous Sedation

Interventions

Sponsors

Department of Anesthesiology, Wuhan General Hospital of the Chinese PLA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients were considered eligible to participate if they were 20 years to 65 years and scheduled for colonoscopy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria were hypersensitivity to propofol, fat milk, soybeans, or eggs; ASA risk class 3 or higher; serious heart, lung, liver and kidney dysfunction; obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS); body mass =28kg/m2; difficult intubation; history of drug or alcohol abuse; refuse to participate in the study; and pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Number of Body Movement;Recovery Time;Pain Score;vital signs;adverse effects;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactGuangjun Hu

Department of Anesthesiology, Wuhan General Hospital of the Chinese PLA

jeanhu@163.com+86 18907132861

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026