FindTrial
Sign In

COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF TWO POSITIVE EXPIRATORY PRESSURE DEVICES IN SEVERE COPD PATIENTS : TEMPORARY POSITIVE EXPIRAYORY PRESSURE ( T-PEP) (Uniko) VERSUS OSCILLATORY POSITIVE EXPIRATORY PRESSURE (O-PEP)(Lung Flute)

COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF TWO POSITIVE EXPIRATORY PRESSURE DEVICES IN SEVERE COPD PATIENTS : TEMPORARY POSITIVE EXPIRAYORY PRESSURE ( T-PEP) (Uniko) VERSUS OSCILLATORY POSITIVE EXPIRATORY PRESSURE (O-PEP)(Lung Flute)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-IPR-16008487
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-05-18
Start date
2014-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Interventions

TPEP Group:TPEP chest physiotherapy
OPEP Group:OPEP chest physiotherapy
control group:best medical therapy

Sponsors

ASL4 Chiavarese Ligurua
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
45 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with severe COPD (FEV1 < 50 % )

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: exacerbation of COPD or hospitalization for COPD within 8 weeks prior to recruitment, predominant asthma or bronchiectasis by clinical assessment, inability to comply with study procedures or dinied written informed consence

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
COPD exacerbations;—

Countries

ITALY

Contacts

Public ContactAntonello Nicolini

Respiratory diseases Unit Sestri levante via terzi 43

antonellonicolini@gmai.com+39 0 185329145

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026