FindTrial
Sign In

A prospective and randomized comparison of rigid ureteroscopic to flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents

A prospective and randomized comparison of rigid ureteroscopic to flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-IOR-17010986
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-03-27
Start date
2012-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ureteral stent retrival

Interventions

A:rigid ureteroscopic retrieval of ureteral stents
flexible cystoscop:flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents

Sponsors

5th Affiliated Hospital,Guangzhou Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: from July 2012 to July 2013, 300 adult patients with unilateral 6 Fr. double-J ureteral stents were accrued for the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with residual stones, chronic renal failure, diabetes, solitary kidney, history of sepsis, febrile infection, or migrated stents were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
operative time;perioperative and postoperative pain;postoperative hematuria;irritable bladder symptoms;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactDehui Lai

5th Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University

dehuilai@hotmail.com+86 18922186874

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026