Skip to content

Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs conventional follicular-phase ovarian stimulation in poor ovarian responders undergone assisted reproductive technology: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs conventional follicular-phase ovarian stimulation in poor ovarian responders undergone assisted reproductive technology: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-IOR-17010550
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-02-04
Start date
2017-01-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

infertility

Interventions

follicular-phase ovarian stimulation:follicular-phase ovarian stimulation

Sponsors

Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
20 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients should be charactered at least two of the following three features: 1. advanced maternal age(aged over40 years) or any other risk factor for POR; 2. a previous POR (oocytes retrieved less than or equal to 3 in conventional protocols); 3. an abnormal ovarian reserve test (AFC 5-7 or AMH 0.5-1.1 ug/L).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Hydrosalpinx; endometriosis; intrauterine adhesions; uterine malformation; ovarian tumor surgery; chromosome abnormality; reproductive tract infection and any contraindications to ovarian stimulation treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the number of oocytes retrieved;the number of viable embryos;clinical pregnancy rate;fertilization rate;Utilization of oocytes;Embryo implantation rate;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactDeng Yu

Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center

549028398@qq.com+86 15920396545

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026