Skip to content

Comparison of Novel ‘Midline approach endotracheal intubation’ with conventional ‘Lateral approach endotracheal intubation’ under video laryngoscope in simple and difficult manikins by experienced and novice personnel

Comparison of Novel ‘Midline approach endotracheal intubation’ with conventional ‘Lateral approach endotracheal intubation’ under video laryngoscope in simple and difficult manikins by experienced and novice personnel

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-IOR-17010474
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-01-19
Start date
2017-01-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

trachea endotrachea tube intubation

Interventions

Three groups:midline endotracheal intubation

Sponsors

Changhua Christian Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Anesthesiologist and Anesthetic trainee who need to be skilled in endotracheal intubation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: NA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
the duration of first successful intubation by Midline approach endotracheal intubation;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactChia-Ming Chang

Changhua Christian Hospital

133543@cch.org.tw+886 988290905

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026