FindTrial
Sign In

Epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia for video-asisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy: Analgesic effectiveness and role in enhanced recovery after surgery

Comparison of ropivacaine patient-controlled epidural analgesia with sufentanil introvenous patient-controlled analgesia for perioperative analgesia and recovery after video-asisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-IOR-17010385
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-01-11
Start date
2017-01-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epidural analgesia during enhanced recovery after surgery lobectomy

Interventions

Group PCA :sufentanil intravnous patient-controlled analgesia
Group TEA:ropivacaine epidural patient-controlled analgesia

Sponsors

The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients qualified for VATS lobectomy, aged 20-70 years, of both genders, ASA I-III.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Technical failures to insert an epidural catheter, conversion of VATS to thocacotomy, discontinuation of local anesthesia for technical reasons(e.g. catheter slipping out or damage), rinability to provide informed consent,and medical containdication for thoracic epidural analgesia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain scores;gut fuction;The time to a diet;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The postoperative length of hospital stay;The length of PACU stay;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHaichen Chu

The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

haichen0312@aliyun.com+86 18661805897

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026