FindTrial
Sign In

A comparison on the reliability of two quality of clinical evidence assessment approaches: a randomized controlled trial

A comparison on the reliability of two quality of clinical evidence assessment approaches: a randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-IOR-16008898
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-07-18
Start date
2016-08-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Two groups:Participants will receive a training course (2 hours) for using CHIMERAS versus Participants will receive a training course (2 hours) for using GRADE.

Sponsors

The Chinese UNiversity of Hong Kong
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criterion for the recruited raters in this study is undergraduate medical / public health / nursing or community health practice students who have no prior experience in quality of evidence assessment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Students with prior experience either in performing quality of evidence assessment will be excluded from this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Inter-rater reliability among individual raters before consensus;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Inter-rater reliability across pairs of raters after consensus;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vincent Chi Ho Chung

JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, the Chinese University of Hong Kong

vchung@cuhk.edu.hk+852 21457489

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026