Skip to content

Effect of high-flow nasal cannula versus conventional bag-mask ventilation for patients undergoing modified electroconvulsive therapy

Effect of high-flow nasal cannula versus conventional bag-mask ventilation for patients undergoing modified electroconvulsive therapy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-INR-17012941
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-10-11
Start date
2017-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-10-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

airway management of modified electroconvulsive therapy

Interventions

B group:conventional bag-mask ventilation

Sponsors

Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong General Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. patients scheduled for modified electroconvulsive therapy; 2. Patients of ASA I-II; 3. Patients' age ranged from 18 to 65 years; 4. Patients' BMI between 18.5-23.9.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; 2. Patients with cardiac or pulmonary insufficiency, abnormal renal or hepatic function; 3. Patients with Alcoholism or drug dependence; 4. Patients with severe vision disorder or hearing disorder; 5. Patients who are not able to cooperate on the test or difficult to communicate with.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
blood oxygen saturation (spo 2);lowest intraoperative blood oxygen saturation;gastric volume;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Breathing recovery time;consciousness recovery time;therapeutic effect of ECT;adverse reaction;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactSheng Wang

Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong General Hospital

shengwang_gz@163.com+86 13560182353

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026