Skip to content

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Subvastus Versus Tranditional Medial Parapatellar Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on Inflammation and Muscle Damage Markers

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Subvastus Versus Tranditional Medial Parapatellar Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on Inflammation and Muscle Damage Markers

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-INR-17012561
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-09-03
Start date
2017-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

osteoarthritis of knee

Interventions

Case series:Minimally Invasive Subvastus TKA

Sponsors

Affiliated Hospital of Qiingdao University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
50 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Any patient with osteoarthritis of the knee who had unsuccessful nonoperative management and for whom total knee arthroplasty was indicated, who had not had prior knee surgery, and who could tolerate general anesthesia was considered to be a candidate for inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria included inflammatory arthropathies, prior knee surgery, prior infection, an inability to tolerate general anesthesia, or an unwillingness to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
CK;CK-MB;TNF-a;IL-1b;IL-6;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHaining Zhang

Affiliated Hospital of Qiingdao University

zhhaining@hotmail.com+86 18661800365

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026