FindTrial
Sign In

Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy for Patients with Thoracoscopic Lobectomy after Extubation

Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy for Patients with Thoracoscopic Lobectomy after Extubation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-INR-17010582
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-02-08
Start date
2015-01-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postextubation respiratory failure

Interventions

HFNC oxygen therapy group:use high flow nasal canula oxygen therapy
COG:conventional oxygen therapy

Sponsors

Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with intermediate to high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) were eligible for participation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients were excluded from the study if they were immunocompromised; were pregnant; converted to an open thoracotomy because of poor visualization or bleeding; were aged 80 years or if informed consent could not be obtained.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The incidence of hypoxemia;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
postoperative pulmonary complications;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactYu Yuetian

Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

fishyyt@sina.com+86 13818227011

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026