Skip to content

A clinical Comparison of Treatment of Prompting Drainage tube postoperation or Not: A New Comprehension of ERAS Theory

A clinical Comparison of Treatment of Prompting Drainage tube postoperation or Not: A New Comprehension of ERAS Theory

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-INR-16009286
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-09-27
Start date
2015-12-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

trauma

Interventions

experiment group:Without drainage tube postoperation
control group:With drainage tube postoperation

Sponsors

Beijing Jishuitan Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Simple tibia fructure,distal radius fructure,ankle fructure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: other complex fructures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
time in hospital;type of fructure;wound state;temperature one day after operation;temperature two day after operation;temperature three day after operation;HB preoperation;HB postoperation;WBC preoperation;WBC postoperation;NEUT preoperation;NEUT postoperation;VAS score preoperation;VAS score postoperation;wound state 2 weeks postoperation;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
red or not;red area;swollen or not;tension state;homatoma state;red or not 2 weeks postoperation;red area 2 weeks postoperation;swollen or not 2 weeks postoperation;tension state 2 weeks postoperation;homatoma state 2 weeks postoperation;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactLi Ting

Beijing Jishuitan Hospital

liting2000@sina.com+86 13910084939

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026