Skip to content

A randomised controlled trial on routine episiotomy versus restrictive episiotomy in Chinese nulliparous women

A randomised controlled trial on routine episiotomy versus restrictive episiotomy in Chinese nulliparous women

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-INR-16009223
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-09-19
Start date
2016-09-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

obstetric anal sphincter injury

Interventions

Two groups:Restrictive episiotomy versus Routine episiotomy

Sponsors

The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Chinese nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy who present at the first trimester to the antenatal clinic; 2. Willing to give written consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Non-Chinese ethnicity; 2. Aged less than 18 years old; 3. Mental incapacity; 4. Women with multiple pregnancy or multiparous; 5. Previous medical history that is contraindicated for vaginal delivery; 6. Refuse to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Prevalence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS; third or fourth degree tear);

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The changes of pelvic floor disorders after delivery;The changes of pelvic floor ultrasound morphology after the delivery;Factors contributing to the pelvic floor disorders and the changes;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactCHAN Symphorosa Shing Chee

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

symphorosa@cuhk.edu.hk+852 26322810

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026