Skip to content

A Random-Control trial to Compare the Difference of Short-Term and Long-Term Therapeutic Effect, Complications and Prognosis Between One-Step Combination Treatment and Single Endovascular Laser Therapy (sEVLT)

A Randomized, Controlled trial to Compare the Difference of Short-Term and Long-Term Therapeutic Effect, Complications and Prognosis Between One-Step Combination Treatment and Single Endovascular Laser Therapy (sEVLT)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-INR-16009200
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2016-09-13
Start date
2016-10-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

varicosis of great saphenous vein

Interventions

One-Step Combination Treatment Group:Endo-Vascular Laser Therapy Combines Therapies of Sclerosing Foam Injection, Point–Form-Stripping and High Ligation of Great Saphenous Vein
Single Endo-Vascular Laser Therapy Group:Endo-Vascular Laser Therapy

Sponsors

The Department of Vascular Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) equal or than older or eighteen; (2) Grade 2 to Grade 6 of CEAP Classification; (3) Reflux time of GSV or SSV is longer than 1 second; (4) No deep venous thrombosis, varicose vein of lower limb is not secondary to other disease; (5) The pathological veins were not previously injected with sclerosing foam, and patients do not have systematic complications that seriously affects tolerance of anesthesia; (6) Collateral venous branch presents as crumby structure, and the structural diameter is longer than 1cm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients with acute deep venous thrombosis or post-thrombosis syndrome; (2) The trunk diameter of GSV or SSV is larger than 3mm and smaller than 15mm; (3) Patients with severe tortuosity of GSV is unsuitable for endo-vascular laser therapy; (4) Grade 2 to Grade 6 of CEAP Classification; (5) Reflux time of GSV or SSV is longer than 1 second; (6) Patients with apparent contraindications for anesthesia; (7) Patients with obvious contraindications for sclerosing foam therapy; (8) with bad compliance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of Life;

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical Success Rate;Socioeconomic Benefit;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactPfro. Shaoying Lu

The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University

robertlu@mail.xjtu.edu.cn+86 18991232015

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026