FindTrial
Sign In

A comparative study of intermittent oro-esophageal feeding versus traditional nasogastric (NG) feeding among stroke patients with dysphagia

A comparative study of intermittent oro-esophageal feeding versus traditional nasogastric feeding among stroke stroke patients with dysphagia

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-INC-17011741
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-06-22
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

stroke patients with dysphagia

Interventions

IOE group:intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding
NG group:nasogastric tube feeding

Sponsors

Mianyang Central Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Aged 18 to 75 years; dysphagia diagnosed as Kubota drinking water test assessment level 3 or higher;pantients with no esophageal obstruction, esophageal varices, esophageal cancer and other esophageal lesions; willing to participate and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Non stoke patients; patients who decline to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Nutrition status;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The rate of aspiration pneumonia;The rate of adverse reactions;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactHuang Hua-ping

Mianyang Central Hospital

jrzhou26@aliyun.com+86 0816-2239671

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026