FindTrial
Sign In

Difference positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP) influence inferior vena cava variation prediction in fluid response

Difference positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP) influence inferior vena cava variation prediction in fluid response

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-DDD-17010772
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-03-03
Start date
2017-03-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shock

Interventions

Gold Standard:inferior vena cava variation determined by ultrasund examination
Index test:positive&#32
endexpiratory&#32
pressure&#32
(PEEP)

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Circulatory failure(meet at least one of the following conditions): 1) HR>90bpm; 2) SBP2mmol/L; 4) UO<0.5ml/kg.h; 5) SvO2<65% or ScvO2<70%; 2. Patient with Mechanical ventilation need to adjust the PEEP: 3. Older than 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pulmonary hypertension; 2. Pulmonary fibrosis disease; 3. Malformed cardiac or inferior vena cava; 4. Other reasons interfere the quality of lung ultrasound image; 5. Pregnancy; 6. Amputation or other reasons which unable to complete the passive leg raising test.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Inferior vena cava variation;SV;CO;SVV;—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
IAP;CVP;MAP;HR;—

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactGuan Xiangdong

The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

wangluhao1989@hotmail.com+86 15986352770

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026