Skip to content

A comparison between five different optical coherence tomography angiography in clinical performance

A comparison between five different optical coherence tomography in clinical performance

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ChiCTR
Registry ID
ChiCTR-DDD-17010355
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2017-01-08
Start date
2017-01-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2017-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ocular Fundus Diseases, Healthy retina

Interventions

Gold Standard:Optical coherence tomography with fundus fluorescein angiography or/and indocyanine green angiography

Sponsors

Shanghai General Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Male or female patients, over 18 years old, without limitations in ethics; (2) Patients with diagnosed ocular fundus diseases (CNV/PCV/RVO/RAO, etc); and patients without ocular fundus diseases; (3)Readed and fully understand the informed consent files, agreed and signed to join this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Women who were pregnant or lactating; (2) Unconscious patients; (3)Patients with active or suspected ocular infectious diseases; (4) Patients without fixation visions; (5) Patients with opacity of refractive media; (6) Other patients that cannot undergo examinations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Artifacts quantity;Singal-to-noise ratio;Aquisition time;saving time;processing time;

Countries

China

Contacts

Public ContactYU Suqin

Shanghai General Hospital

sq-yu@163.com+86 13701739566

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ChiCTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026