FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing piezosurgery with regular drilling to see which is better for gum health and implant success in patients undergoing rehabilitation for edentulous sites.

Comparative evaluation of piezosurgery and conventional drilling technique on the peri implant health and implant success a randomised controlled trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/07/114129
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-07-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Piezosurgery: Implants will be placed through piezosurgery in the edentulous sites.The prosthesis will be delivered after 3 months of implant placement. Follow up will be done upto 6 mo

Sponsors

Vanshika Thakur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Single or multiple missing teeth Subjects with good plaque control and showing good compliance Subjects willing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Subjects with systemic illness, osteoporosis, bleeding disorders, immunocompromised state and debilitating disease etc. Insufficient density or height of residual ridge Pregnant and lactating females Subjects with history of smoking or smokeless tobacco Drug or alcohol abuse Occlusal interferences Subjects with history of allergy Radiotherapy or Chemotherapy for malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hard Tissue Measures like primary Implant stability and Secondary implant Stability and Marginal Bone Level Implant Survival Timepoint: Primary stability will be measured immediately after implant placement and secondary stability after 3 months of implant placement Marginal Bone Level will be measured immediately and after 3 months of implant placement and at the time of prosthesis and after 6 months Implant survival at 6 months after prosthesis delivery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Soft Tissue Measures like Probing Depth & Bleeding on Probing Biomarker evaluation osteocalcin if feasible Patient reported outcomeTimepoint: Probing depth & Bleeding on Probing at 2 weeks ,1 month,3 months & 6 months after prosthesis delivery Biomarker evaluation of osteocalcin at 15 days & 1 month after implant placement if feasible Patient reported outcome for pain & comfort immediately after implant placement & for comfort , masticatory function,speech,esthetics & overall satisfaction after prosthesis delivery—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactVanshika Thakur

Banaras Hindu university

drmonika97@gmail.com9335499117

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026