Skip to content

Comparing different materials for measurement of implant impression.

Evaluation and comparison of prefabricated peek with custom milled titanium and cobalt chromium scan body using stl file analysis for the accuracy of digital implant impression: an in vivo study. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/07/114040
Enrollment
36
Registered
2026-07-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K06- Other disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NIL Intervention2: CAD CAM-milled Titanium Scan Body: Following osseointegration, the healing abutment will be removed, and a CAD/CAM-milled titanium scan body will be attached to

Sponsors

Dr Anuj Agrawal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with a single posterior missing tooth in either the maxillary or mandibular arch. 2. Patients with a single, well-integrated dental implant placed in a healed site. 3. Implant sites with healthy peri-implant soft tissue and no signs of inflammation. 4. Patients indicated for digital implant impression as part of prosthetic rehabilitation. 5. Patients willing to participate and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with systemic diseases affecting bone healing. 2. Chronic smokers and patients with alcoholism. 3. Patients with known allergy to titanium, cobalt, or chromium. 4. Presence of peri-implantitis or peri-implant soft tissue pathology. 5. Patients with multiple implants, full-arch implant restorations, or splinted implants. 6. Patients with restricted mouth opening or conditions affecting intraoral scanning. 7. Uncooperative patients or those unable to comply with the study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
There will be significant difference in the accuracy of digital implant impressions obtained using prefabricated PEEK, titanium, and cobalt-chromium scan bodies, as evaluated by STL file analysis.Timepoint: At baseline scan of 1st patient, 6 months Data collection of all STL files, 9 months Superimposition of all STL files, 12 months Estimated Outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Anuj Agrawal

Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital

jaykumar.gade@sdk-dentalcollege.edu.in9921425443

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Aug 10, 2026